Skip to main content
Log in

Not Letting Evidence Get in the Way of Assumptions: Testing the Clash of Civilizations Thesis with More Recent Data

  • Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research note I examine Huntington's ‘clash of civilizations’ thesis in the light of his arguments to his detractors to apply his thesis to post-Cold War armed conflicts within states. Drawing on more recent data on intrastate armed conflict to 1999, I demonstrate that Huntington's thesis is not substantiated. What we observe is that many of the interethnic and inter-religious conflicts that occur in the post-Cold War era are clashes within rather than between civilizations, just as Huntington's critics have noted previously. In fact, in the post-Cold War era, where there have been changes in the incidence of ‘clashes of civilizations’ we find that their number has actually declined, if only marginally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henderson, E. Not Letting Evidence Get in the Way of Assumptions: Testing the Clash of Civilizations Thesis with More Recent Data. Int Polit 42, 458–469 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800117

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800117

Keywords

Navigation