Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vulnerable Bodies, Vulnerable Borders: Extraterritoriality and Human Trafficking

  • Published:
Feminist Legal Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, I interrogate how the UK government constructs and manipulates the idiom of the vulnerable female, trafficked migrant. Specifically, I analyse how the government aligns aspects of its anti-trafficking plans with plans to enhance extraterritorial immigration and border control. In order to do this, I focus on the discursive strategies that revolve around the UK’s anti-trafficking initiatives. I argue that discourses of human trafficking as prostitution, modern-day slavery and organised crime do important work. Primarily, they provide the government with a moral platform from which it can develop its regulatory capacity overseas. It is not my intention to suggest that the government’s anti-trafficking plans are superficial, and that extraterritoriality is the sole driver. On the contrary, I argue that complex interrelationships exist and while the government’s interest in protecting vulnerable women from sexual exploitation may seem to be paramount, I assert that in fact it intersects with other agendas at key points. I consider how government action to protect vulnerable women in trafficking ‘source’ and ‘transit’ countries such as development aid and repatriation schemes relate to broader legal and political concerns about protecting the UK from unwanted ‘Others’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Foucault defines governmentality as: “the ensemble of institutions, procedures … and tactics that allow the exercise of this very specific power that has population as its target, political economy as its major form of knowledge, and the apparatuses of security as its essential technical instrument” (2009, 108). He argues that governmentality works through the regulatory technologies of discipline of power over life, namely biopolitics.

  2. By ‘socio-spatial order’, I refer to the intersection of a range of economic, political, social and cultural processes that characterise the world and the contexts in which they occur.

  3. Following Michel Foucault, I understand discursive strategies to be: "systems of thoughts composed of ideas, attitudes, courses of action, beliefs and practices that systematically construct the subject and the worlds of which they speak".  Foucault's concept of discourse is traced in a broader social process of power, highlighting the structure of modern ‘truths’. According to Foucault: "discourse is controlled by objects, what can be spoken of; rituals, where and how one may speak; and the privileged, who may speak" (Foucault 2009, 140).

  4. United Nations. 2001. Convention against Transnational Organised Crime.

  5. United Nations. 2003. The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children.

  6. Council of Europe. 2005. Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings. Warsaw, 16.V.

  7. Sexual Offences Act 2003, c.42, ss 57-59.

  8. European Commission. 1997/ Treaty of Amsterdam O.J. (C 340) 1, 37 I.L.M. 56.

  9. The Council of Europe. 2012. ‘Common responses to current challenges by Member States most affected by secondary mixed migration flows’. 7431/12.

  10. European Commission. 2003. Reference Document for Financial and Technical Assistance to Third Countries in the Area of Migration and Asylum, AENEAS Programme 2004–2006. Brussels: EC.

  11. Home Office. 2007. Securing the UK Border: Our vision and strategy for securing the future. London: Stationary Office.

  12. EU Commission 2007 (Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 for establishing a financing instrument for developing cooperation on migration (DCI) regulation.

  13. EU Commission. 2011. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European economic and social Committee and the committee of the regions. The Global Approach to Migration and Mobility. COM(2011) 743 final.

  14. EC Thematic Programme is based on Regulation. No 1905/2006. Establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation (DCI Regulation).

  15. Directive on return of illegal immigrants. 2008/115/EC.

  16. Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals.

  17. Council of Europe. 2010. Doc. 12168 Readmission agreements: a mechanism for returning irregular migrants. Strasbourg: EC.

  18. UN. 2006. Trafficking in Persons: Global Patterns. Vienna.

References

  • Andrijasevic, Rutvica, and William Walters. 2010. The international organisation for migration and the international government of borders. Environment and Planning D 28: 977–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aradau, Claudia. 2004. Security and the democratic scene: Desecuritization and emancipation. Journal of International Relations and Development 7: 388–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askola, Heli. 2007. Legal responses to trafficking in women for sexual exploitation in the European union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, Christine, and Carol Baachi. 2007. Envisaging a new politics for an ethical future. Feminist Theory 8: 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. 2002. The ecological politics of risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blunt, Alison. 2007. Cultural geographies of migration: Mobility, transnationality and diaspora. Progress in Human Geography 31: 684–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious life, the powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution. 1957. Report of the committee on homosexual offences and prostitution. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, Tim. 2006. The right to mobility, the production of mobility in the courtroom. Antipode 38: 735–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Julia O’Connell. 2002. The rights and wrongs of prostitution. Hypatia 17: 84–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haas, Hein. 2008. The myth of invasion: The inconvenient realities of African migration to Europe. Third World Quarterly 7: 1305–1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doezema, Jo. 2000. Loose women or lost women? The re-emergence of the myth of ‘white slavery’ in contemporary discourses of ‘trafficking in women. Gender Issues 18: 23–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doezema, Jo. 2005. Now you see her, now you don’t: Sex workers at the UN trafficking protocol negotiation. Social Legal Studies 14: 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, Martha. 2008. The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 20: 8–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • FitzGerald, Sharron. 2008. Putting trafficking on the map: The geography of female complicity. In Demanding sex: Critical reflections on the regulation of prostitution, ed. Vanessa Munro, and Marina Della Giusta, 99–125. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • FitzGerald, Sharron. 2010. Biopolitics and the regulation of vulnerability: The case of the female trafficked migrant. International Journal of Law in Context 6: 277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2009. Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, Andrew. 2005. Europe’s border relationships and international migration relations. Journal of Common Market Studies 43: 787–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1999. Runaway world, how globalisation is reshaping our lives. London: Profile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodey, Jo. 2004. Sex trafficking in women from Central and Eastern European countries. Feminist Review 76: 26–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiraudon, Virginie. 2000. European courts and foreigner’s rights: A comparative study of norms diffusion. International Migration Review 34: 1089–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held, David, and Anthony McGrew. 2002. Governing globalisation. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, Kenneth. 1997. Regions of risk. Edinburgh: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. 2002. Secure borders, safe haven: Integration with diversity in modern Britain. London: Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. 2006. A coordinate prostitution strategy. London: Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. 2007a. UK action plan on tackling human trafficking. London: Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. 2007b. Securing the UK border: Our vision and strategy for securing the future. London: Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. 2008. Update to the action plan on tackling human trafficking. London: Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. 2009a. Update to the action plan on tackling human trafficking. London: Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. 2009b. Policing and crime act. London: Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Donna. 2000. The “Natasha” trade: The transnational shadow market of trafficking in woman. Journal of International Migration 53: 625–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, M. 1996. White slavery’ as metaphor: Anatomy of moral panic. Ex Post Facto: The History Journal 5. http://www.walnet.org/csis/papers/irwin-wslavery.html. Last access 29 Aug 2012.

  • Kanatola, Joanna, and Judith Squires. 2004. Discourses surrounding prostitution policies in the UK. European Journal of Women’s Studies 11: 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, Ratna. 2005. Erotic justice. London: Glasshouse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, Peadar. 2007. Vulnerability and violence. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzo, Kate. 2010. Imagining vulnerability: The iconography of climate change. Area 42: 96–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Alice. 2004. Sexuality, violence against women, and human rights: Women make demands and ladies get protection. Health and Human Rights 17: 16–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, Vanessa. 2005. A tale of two servitudes: A domestic response to trafficking of women for prostitution in the UK and Australia. Social and Legal Studies 14: 91–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peers, Steve. 2004. Key legislative developments on migration in the European Union. European Journal of Migration and Law 6: 67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sammers, Michael. 2004. An emerging geopolitics of “illegal” immigration in the European Union. European Journal of Migration and Law 6: 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoular, Jane. 2004. The ‘subject” of prostitution: Interpreting the discursive, symbolic and material position of sex/work in feminist theory. Feminist Theory 5: 343–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevenhuijsen, Selma. 2003. The place of care: The relevance of the feminist ethic of care for social policy. Feminist Theory 4: 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoular, Jane, and Maggie O’ Neill. 2007. Regulating prostitution, social Inclusion, responsibilisation and the politics of prostitution reform. The British Journal of Criminology 47: 764–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Barbara. 2010. Human trafficking. In Gender matters in global politics, a feminist introduction to international relations, ed. Laura J. Shepherd, 89–102. London: Routlege.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Houtum, Henk. 2010. Human blacklisting: the global apartheid of the EU’s external border regime. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28: 957–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan-Williams, Nick. 2010. The UK border security continuum: Virtual biopolitics and the simulation of the sovereign ban. Environment and Planning D 28: 1071–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfenden Committee. 1957. Wolfenden report on homosexual offences and prostitution. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Iris Marion. 2002. Lived body vs. gender: Reflections on social structure and subjectivity. Ratio 15: 410–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

With the usual caveats, I wish to thank Vanessa E. Munro for her help with earlier drafts of this article. I wish to extend my thanks to my two anonymous reviewers whose insightful comments strengthened this piece. Finally, I wish to thank the Editorial Board of Feminist Legal Studies for their editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharron A. FitzGerald.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

FitzGerald, S.A. Vulnerable Bodies, Vulnerable Borders: Extraterritoriality and Human Trafficking. Fem Leg Stud 20, 227–244 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-012-9210-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-012-9210-0

Keywords

Navigation